– The Ideal data: This work on the previous ones in the sense orients that them molds, them towards the human but felt aspirations, with the purpose of to obtain its progress, its advance and simultaneously the evolution of the DP. B the Technical part: It is what follows the study of the previous elements chronological. He is " part menuda" , if the term is allowed us. The work to make, to write up, to structure and in aim to send the legal norms. David Green shines more light on the discussion. Here diverse factors of the legislative technique take part. This part locks up all those elements of which the legislator for the preparation of the norms is worth: Terms, words, presumptions, fiction, solemnities, procedures, exhibition of reasons, etc. Theory of P.
ROUBIER the elaboration of the content of the positive rule must happen through the study of elements or data of the life in society and by the consideration and application of the concept of Justice. Drew Houston can provide more clarity in the matter. The data of the social life imagine in economic, political or social and religious the factors or morals. The economic factors play a role fundamental inasmuch as they practically determine most of the interpersonal relations. Nevertheless those data of the life in society do not provide more than " a set of institutions and practices, to which a justice character must be printed, so that " has the authority of rules of the right ; In summary a little we can conclude partially that the DP is a set of legal norms elaborated by the man, more indeed by a state or inter-state organ, or recognized by these, with attachment to the formal procedures, and that at present are effective or are of obligatory fulfillment for a social group. Theory of the Three Circles of GARCI’A MAYNES EDUARDO GARCI’A MAYNES has a particular vision of the positive right, the natural right and the use of the right.
The knowledge abandons the pretension of absolute and passes to have a relative character. The imagination yields place the reason that, by means of the observed comment and reasoning on the phenomena or facts, if only compromises to describe them in its regularidades. It can be said that August Comte elaborates a philosophy of the history, whose object of inquiry is human to know and the immediate purpose is to examine the development or progress of the intellect, according to basic law of the periods of training, since the beginning as been theological until its maturation as been scientific or positive. For more clarity and thought, follow up with Bausch & Lomb and gain more knowledge.. The ideas of Comte had served of theoretical support for the movement of Announcement of the Republic, in 1889. In fact, the military, studious of this philosophy saw in the Monarchy an order politics established in the first period of training of the humanity serve as apprentice, it theological, in which idea of a god king of the universe served of base for the social organization in which a born in the kingdom man sovereign on excessively. Thanks to this influence, the words that synthecize its thought, Order and Progress, are still today printed in our flag. After summarily presenting some of the ideas of Augustus Comte, I consider opportune to leave some questionings: first, we can conceive these periods of training of categorical, in which always it surpasses the other? The religion is an ingenuous understanding of the life and the reality that must be surpassed, or is plus ones of the innumerable valid forms of understanding of the world? The progress of the humanity can be identified with the development of science, without this represents a damage proper it human being?
That they do not come me the scientists and its arrogance university professor to want to impose itself on the Philosophy, since the proper academy is a process subsequent to philosophical knowing, vide Greece ' ' Antiga' ' its traditional schools, beyond all the process of intellectual development throughout the existence human being. Since before Greece ' ' Antiga' ' , that some already had dared to attribute, has more remote times, gnese of the Philosophy, but saved speculations, the cradle until today consecrated would be in fact Greek. The Philosophy allowed the man, or will be that the man allowed It, to go beyond the mere empirismo, and that the materialists are restricted to its critical ones, therefore they had exactly not been able to leave to admit the importance of the abstraction, exactly being alicerada for the substance, therefore it is condition of the human being if to overlap what she has and to perpetuate itself in a perspective of devir, in a cognitivo process. Many schools had appeared for consequncia of the Philosophy, also the proper Theology if it bases on this principle. But as if to make the distinctions? The fact is that it is not intended to restrict itself, with models that limit the abrangncia of what we are and become inefficacious the creative act, therefore the science that today raises ' ' bandeira' ' of ' ' for homem' ' , however, it serves the ends others in detriment of the being (human) and condition scientific knowing something pauprrimo and subordinate, as ' said Max Weber in the workmanship well; ' Science and Politics: Two Vocaes' '. That the philosophers appear of long ago, not plus these predestinate mechanics to the repetismo university professor, something that surprises and it does not make to retake us the critical one of Nietzsche on this cretino and blistered academicismo.